Leveraging base excision repair for efficient adenine base editing of mitochondrial DNA – Nature Biotechnology
Kim, J. S. & Chen, J. Base editing of organellar DNA with programmable deaminases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 34–45 (2024).
Google Scholar
Barrera-Paez, J. D. & Moraes, C. T. Mitochondrial genome engineering coming-of-age. Trends Genet. 38, 869–880 (2022).
Google Scholar
Silva-Pinheiro, P. & Minczuk, M. The potential of mitochondrial genome engineering. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 199–214 (2022).
Google Scholar
Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
Google Scholar
Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. Base editing with a Cpf1–cytidine deaminase fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 324–327 (2018).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Efficient base editing in methylated regions with a human APOBEC3A–Cas9 fusion. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 946–949 (2018).
Google Scholar
Yang, B., Yang, L. & Chen, J. Development and application of base editors. CRISPR J. 2, 91–104 (2019).
Google Scholar
Yang, L. & Chen, J. A tale of two moieties: rapidly evolving CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 45, 874–888 (2020).
Google Scholar
Richter, M. F. et al. Phage-assisted evolution of an adenine base editor with improved Cas domain compatibility and activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 883–891 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, X. et al. Cas12a base editors induce efficient and specific editing with low DNA damage response. Cell Rep. 31, 107723 (2020).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Eliminating base-editor-induced genome-wide and transcriptome-wide off-target mutations. Nat. Cell Biol. 23, 552–563 (2021).
Google Scholar
Han, W. et al. Design and application of the transformer base editor in mammalian cells and mice. Nat. Protoc. 18, 3194–3228 (2023).
Google Scholar
Cho, S. I. et al. Targeted A-to-G base editing in human mitochondrial DNA with programmable deaminases. Cell 185, 1764–1776 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. A bacterial cytidine deaminase toxin enables CRISPR-free mitochondrial base editing. Nature 583, 631–637 (2020).
Google Scholar
Guo, J. et al. A DddA ortholog-based and transactivator-assisted nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine base editors with expanded target compatibility. Mol. Cell 83, 1710–1724 (2023).
Google Scholar
Huang, J. et al. Discovery of deaminase functions by structure-based protein clustering. Cell 186, 3182–3195 (2023).
Google Scholar
Mi, L. et al. DddA homolog search and engineering expand sequence compatibility of mitochondrial base editing. Nat. Commun. 14, 874 (2023).
Google Scholar
Lim, K., Cho, S. I. & Kim, J. S. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA editing in human cells with zinc finger deaminases. Nat. Commun. 13, 366 (2022).
Google Scholar
Willis, J. C. W., Silva-Pinheiro, P., Widdup, L., Minczuk, M. & Liu, D. R. Compact zinc finger base editors that edit mitochondrial or nuclear DNA in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Commun. 13, 7204 (2022).
Google Scholar
Sun, H. et al. Developing mitochondrial base editors with diverse context compatibility and high fidelity via saturated spacer library. Nat. Commun. 14, 6625 (2023).
Google Scholar
Fauser, F. et al. Compact zinc finger architecture utilizing toxin-derived cytidine deaminases for highly efficient base editing in human cells. Nat. Commun. 15, 1181 (2024).
Google Scholar
Yin, L., Shi, K. & Aihara, H. Structural basis of sequence-specific cytosine deamination by double-stranded DNA deaminase toxin DddA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 30, 1153–1159 (2023).
Google Scholar
Krokan, H. E. & Bjoras, M. Base excision repair. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012583 (2013).
Google Scholar
Beard, W. A., Horton, J. K., Prasad, R. & Wilson, S. H. Eukaryotic base excision repair: new approaches shine light on mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 137–162 (2019).
Google Scholar
Devchand, P. R., McGhee, J. D. & van de Sande, J. H. Uracil-DNA glycosylase as a probe for protein–DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3437–3443 (1993).
Google Scholar
Carter, R. J. & Parsons, J. L. Base excision repair, a pathway regulated by posttranslational modifications. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 1426–1437 (2016).
Google Scholar
Lei, L. et al. APOBEC3 induces mutations during repair of CRISPR–Cas9-generated DNA breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 45–52 (2018).
Google Scholar
Georgiadis, P., Polychronaki, N. & Kyrtopoulos, S. A. Progress in high-throughput assays of MGMT and APE1 activities in cell extracts. Mutat. Res. 736, 25–32 (2012).
Google Scholar
Chen, J., Miller, B. F. & Furano, A. V. Repair of naturally occurring mismatches can induce mutations in flanking DNA. eLife 3, e02001 (2014).
Google Scholar
Keijzers, G., Liu, D. & Rasmussen, L. J. Exonuclease 1 and its versatile roles in DNA repair. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 51, 440–451 (2016).
Google Scholar
Cymerman, I. A., Chung, I., Beckmann, B. M., Bujnicki, J. M. & Meiss, G. EXOG, a novel paralog of endonuclease G in higher eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 1369–1379 (2008).
Google Scholar
Yang, C. et al. Structural insights into DNA degradation by human mitochondrial nuclease MGME1. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 11075–11088 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zheng, L. et al. Human DNA2 is a mitochondrial nuclease/helicase for efficient processing of DNA replication and repair intermediates. Mol. Cell 32, 325–336 (2008).
Google Scholar
Mok, B. Y. et al. CRISPR-free base editors with enhanced activity and expanded targeting scope in mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1378–1387 (2022).
Google Scholar
Mok, Y. G. et al. Base editing in human cells with monomeric DddA–TALE fusion deaminases. Nat. Commun. 13, 4038 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yi, Z. et al. Strand-selective base editing of human mitochondrial DNA using mitoBEs. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 498–509 (2024).
Google Scholar
Hu, J. et al. Strand-preferred base editing of organellar and nuclear genomes using CyDENT. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 936–945 (2024).
Google Scholar
Cho, S. I. et al. Engineering TALE-linked deaminases to facilitate precision adenine base editing in mitochondrial DNA. Cell 187, 95–109 (2024).
Google Scholar
Corona, P. et al. A novel mtDNA mutation in the ND5 subunit of complex I in two MELAS patients. Ann. Neurol. 49, 106–110 (2001).
Google Scholar
Lebon, S. et al. Recurrent de novo mitochondrial DNA mutations in respiratory chain deficiency. J. Med. Genet. 40, 896–899 (2003).
Google Scholar
Lei, Z. et al. Mitochondrial base editor induces substantial nuclear off-target mutations. Nature 606, 804–811 (2022).
Google Scholar
Alexeyev, M., Shokolenko, I., Wilson, G. & LeDoux, S. The maintenance of mitochondrial DNA integrity–critical analysis and update. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012641 (2013).
Google Scholar
Fontana, G. A. & Gahlon, H. L. Mechanisms of replication and repair in mitochondrial DNA deletion formation. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 11244–11258 (2020).
Google Scholar
Reddy, P. et al. Selective elimination of mitochondrial mutations in the germline by genome editing. Cell 161, 459–469 (2015).
Google Scholar
Peeva, V. et al. Linear mitochondrial DNA is rapidly degraded by components of the replication machinery. Nat. Commun. 9, 1727 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lapinaite, A. et al. DNA capture by a CRISPR–Cas9-guided adenine base editor. Science 369, 566–571 (2020).
Google Scholar
Nilsen, H. et al. Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG)-deficient mice reveal a primary role of the enzyme during DNA replication. Mol. Cell 5, 1059–1065 (2000).
Google Scholar
Raguram, A., Banskota, S. & Liu, D. R. Therapeutic in vivo delivery of gene editing agents. Cell 185, 2806–2827 (2022).
Google Scholar
Yang, J. et al. ULtiMATE system for rapid assembly of customized TAL effectors. PLoS ONE 8, e75649 (2013).
Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. Enhanced base editing by co-expression of free uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor. Cell Res. 27, 1289–1292 (2017).
Google Scholar
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
Google Scholar
Wilm, A. et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11189–11201 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kim, S. et al. Strelka2: fast and accurate calling of germline and somatic variants. Nat. Methods 15, 591–594 (2018).
Google Scholar
Lee, S., Lee, H., Baek, G. & Kim, J. S. Precision mitochondrial DNA editing with high-fidelity DddA-derived base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 378–386 (2023).
Google Scholar
